首页> 外文OA文献 >A Factual Analysis of Certain Proposed Amendments to the Negotiable Instruments Law
【2h】

A Factual Analysis of Certain Proposed Amendments to the Negotiable Instruments Law

机译:对“票据法”若干拟议修正案的事实分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The first objective in amending the Negotiable InstrumentsLaw should be to bring the statute into as nice adjustment withpresent needs as possible. This consideration, it is believed,overshadows all others. The act, viewed as a part of the contractof the several parties to negotiable paper, should be writtento permit them to carry their transactions through efficiently andin the manner contemplated. At the same time, the legislationshould not cloak unfair practices. It should be drafted to requireonly a minimum of recourse to the courts. Although theseends seem obvious, there is by no means agreement as to howthe statute should be amended to attain them. What is a fairrule, what is an efficient or convenient one, or, in fact, what isthe understanding of the parties to commercial paper concerningtheir agreement in any given case?
机译:修改《票据法》的首要目标应该是根据当前需要对法规进行适当的调整。人们认为,这种考虑使所有其他因素都黯然失色。该法案应被视为可转让票据多方合同的一部分,应写成允许他们以预期的方式有效地进行交易。同时,立法不应掩盖不正当行为。它的起草应仅要求最少诉诸法院。尽管这些目的是显而易见的,但对于如何修改法规以实现这些目的,绝不是一致的。什么是一项原则,什么是有效或便利的原则,或者实际上,在任何给定情况下,商业票据当事人对他们的协议的理解是什么?

著录项

  • 作者

    Turner, Roscoe B.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 1929
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号